top of page
Writer's pictureRETSA Group

Using ChatGPT in Instructional Design: Benefits, Challenges, and Best Practices


An image of a toy robot

The field of instructional design has seen a tremendous transformation in recent years, thanks to the advancements in technology and artificial intelligence (AI). With the rise of chatbots and conversational agents, educators and instructional designers have a powerful tool at their disposal - ChatGPT, a language model developed by OpenAI that can generate human-like responses to natural language queries.


But what exactly is ChatGPT and how can it be used in instructional design? Let's explore some of the benefits and challenges of incorporating ChatGPT into your learning programs.


First, it's important to understand that ChatGPT is a machine learning-based model that has been trained on a massive corpus of human language data. This means that it has a deep understanding of language patterns, grammar, and syntax, and can generate coherent and contextually relevant responses to user queries. In essence, ChatGPT is a virtual assistant that can help learners find information, clarify concepts, and provide feedback in real-time.


One of the main advantages of using ChatGPT in instructional design is its ability to personalise learning experiences. By tailoring responses to individual learners' needs, ChatGPT can help them navigate through complex topics and identify areas where they need more support. For example, if a learner is struggling with a particular concept, they can ask ChatGPT for more information or examples, and the model can provide customised feedback based on their specific learning style and pace.


Another benefit of using ChatGPT is its scalability. Unlike human tutors or instructors who can only assist a limited number of learners at a time, ChatGPT can handle thousands of queries simultaneously, making it an ideal tool for online learning environments or massive open online courses (MOOCs). This means that learners can get immediate assistance without having to wait for their turn or schedule appointments with instructors.


Moreover, ChatGPT can help reduce the cognitive load of learners by providing them with quick and accurate responses to routine questions, freeing up their mental bandwidth to focus on more complex tasks. This is particularly useful in scenarios where learners need to memorise a lot of information or perform repetitive tasks, such as in language learning or vocational training.


However, incorporating ChatGPT into instructional design is not without its challenges. One of the main concerns is the potential for bias in the model's responses. Since ChatGPT learns from human language data, it can inherit the same biases and stereotypes that exist in our society, perpetuating systemic inequalities and discrimination. To mitigate this risk, it's important to train ChatGPT on diverse and inclusive datasets and regularly audit its responses for fairness and accuracy.


Another challenge is the lack of emotional intelligence in ChatGPT. While the model can provide factual information and procedural guidance, it may struggle to recognise and respond appropriately to learners' emotions or affective needs. This can be particularly challenging in situations where learners need emotional support or motivation, such as in mental health counseling or career coaching. To address this limitation, designers can incorporate other technologies such as sentiment analysis or emotion recognition algorithms to supplement ChatGPT's capabilities.


ChatGPT is a powerful tool that can revolutionise the way we design and deliver learning experiences. By leveraging its ability to personalize, scale, and automate learning, we can create more engaging, efficient, and effective learning programs. However, it's important to be aware of the potential challenges and limitations of the technology and take proactive steps to mitigate them. As instructional designers, we have a responsibility to ensure that our use of technology is ethical, inclusive, and learner-centered.



bottom of page